Democratizing Ethical Assessment of Natural Language Generation Models
Amin Rasekh, Ian Eisenberg

TL;DR
This paper introduces TEAL, an open-source tool designed to make ethical assessment of natural language generation models more accessible and standardized for broader use.
Contribution
The paper presents TEAL, a novel tool that democratizes and standardizes ethical evaluation of language models, addressing high entry barriers in the field.
Findings
TEAL enables broader access to ethical assessments.
TEAL standardizes evaluation processes.
Improves transparency in language model ethics.
Abstract
Natural language generation models are computer systems that generate coherent language when prompted with a sequence of words as context. Despite their ubiquity and many beneficial applications, language generation models also have the potential to inflict social harms by generating discriminatory language, hateful speech, profane content, and other harmful material. Ethical assessment of these models is therefore critical. But it is also a challenging task, requiring an expertise in several specialized domains, such as computational linguistics and social justice. While significant strides have been made by the research community in this domain, accessibility of such ethical assessments to the wider population is limited due to the high entry barriers. This article introduces a new tool to democratize and standardize ethical assessment of natural language generation models: Tool for…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEthics and Social Impacts of AI · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
