Complexity of the Guided Local Hamiltonian Problem: Improved Parameters and Extension to Excited States
Chris Cade, Marten Folkertsma, Jordi Weggemans

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that the guided local Hamiltonian problem remains computationally hard under more practical conditions, including 2-local Hamiltonians, high overlap guiding states, and excited state energy estimation.
Contribution
It extends the BQP-completeness of the guided local Hamiltonian problem to 2-local Hamiltonians, high-overlap guiding states, and excited states, improving previous results.
Findings
The problem is BQP-complete for 2-local Hamiltonians.
High-overlap guiding states still lead to BQP-completeness.
The method extends to estimating energies of excited states.
Abstract
Recently it was shown that the so-called guided local Hamiltonian problem -- estimating the smallest eigenvalue of a -local Hamiltonian when provided with a description of a quantum state ('guiding state') that is guaranteed to have substantial overlap with the true groundstate -- is BQP-complete for when the required precision is inverse polynomial in the system size , and remains hard even when the overlap of the guiding state with the groundstate is close to a constant . We improve upon this result in three ways: by showing that it remains BQP-complete when i) the Hamiltonian is 2-local, ii) the overlap between the guiding state and target eigenstate is as large as , and iii) when one is interested in estimating energies of excited states, rather…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
