Euclid: Testing the Copernican principle with next-generation surveys
D. Camarena, V. Marra, Z. Sakr, S. Nesseris, A. Da Silva, J., Garcia-Bellido, P. Fleury, L. Lombriser, M. Martinelli, C. J. A. P. Martins,, J. Mimoso, D. Sapone, C. Clarkson, S. Camera, C. Carbone, S. Casas, S., Ili\'c, V. Pettorino, I. Tutusaus, N. Aghanim, B. Altieri, A. Amara

TL;DR
This paper forecasts how upcoming surveys like Euclid can test the Copernican principle by constraining large-scale inhomogeneities and potential violations, thereby strengthening the foundation of modern cosmology.
Contribution
It provides a forecast of the precision of future surveys in testing the Copernican principle and detecting large-scale inhomogeneities using simulated Euclid data.
Findings
Euclid will improve constraints on the Copernican principle by about 30%.
Future data can detect Gpc-scale inhomogeneities with contrast -0.1.
Constraints vary by 10% depending on observables and scales.
Abstract
The Copernican principle, the notion that we are not at a special location in the Universe, is one of the cornerstones of modern cosmology and its violation would invalidate the Friedmann-Lema\^{\i}tre-Robertson-Walker (FLRW) metric, causing a major change in our understanding of the Universe. Thus, it is of fundamental importance to perform observational tests of this principle. We determine the precision with which future surveys will be able to test the Copernican principle and their ability to detect any possible violations. We forecast constraints on the inhomogeneous Lema\^{\i}tre-Tolman-Bondi model with a cosmological constant (LTB), basically a cosmological constant and cold dark matter (CDM) model, but endowed with a spherical inhomogeneity. We consider combinations of currently available data and simulated Euclid data, together with…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
