Upgrading the protection of children from manipulative and addictive strategies in online games: Legal and technical solutions beyond privacy regulation
Tommaso Crepax, Jan Tobias Muehlberg

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the shortcomings of current EU regulations on protecting children from manipulative online game strategies and proposes integrated legal and technical solutions to enhance safeguarding measures.
Contribution
It introduces a multidisciplinary framework combining legal and technical insights to address manipulation and addiction in children's online gaming beyond existing privacy laws.
Findings
Identifies gaps in current EU regulation for children's online game protection.
Proposes a regulatory upgrade focusing on freedom of thought.
Discusses technological approaches for verifiable privacy and freedom protection.
Abstract
Despite the increasing awareness from academia, civil society and media to the issue of child manipulation online, the current EU regulatory system fails at providing sufficient levels of protection. Given the universality of the issue, there is a need to combine and further these scattered efforts into a unitary, multidisciplinary theory of digital manipulation that identifies causes and effects, systematizes the technical and legal knowledge on manipulative and addictive tactics, and to find effective regulatory mechanisms to fill the legislative gaps. In this paper we discuss manipulative and exploitative strategies in the context of online games for children, suggest a number of possible reasons for the failure of the applicable regulatory system, propose an "upgrade" for the regulatory approach to address these risks from the perspective of freedom of thought, and present and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection · Freedom of Expression and Defamation · Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
