The Dice loss in the context of missing or empty labels: Introducing $\Phi$ and $\epsilon$
Sofie Tilborghs, Jeroen Bertels, David Robben, Dirk Vandermeulen,, Frederik Maes

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the Dice loss in medical image segmentation, focusing on its derivative and behavior with missing or empty labels, and proposes heuristic configurations for improved robustness.
Contribution
It provides a theoretical framework for understanding Dice loss derivatives and introduces heuristic methods for setting parameters to handle missing or empty labels effectively.
Findings
Choice of reduction dimension $\
,
,
Abstract
Albeit the Dice loss is one of the dominant loss functions in medical image segmentation, most research omits a closer look at its derivative, i.e. the real motor of the optimization when using gradient descent. In this paper, we highlight the peculiar action of the Dice loss in the presence of missing or empty labels. First, we formulate a theoretical basis that gives a general description of the Dice loss and its derivative. It turns out that the choice of the reduction dimensions and the smoothing term is non-trivial and greatly influences its behavior. We find and propose heuristic combinations of and that work in a segmentation setting with either missing or empty labels. Second, we empirically validate these findings in a binary and multiclass segmentation setting using two publicly available datasets. We confirm that the choice of and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Neural Network Applications · Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning · Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
MethodsDice Loss
