Can You Fool AI by Doing a 180? $\unicode{x2013}$ A Case Study on Authorship Analysis of Texts by Arata Osada

TL;DR

This study investigates whether authorship analysis systems can correctly attribute texts from the same author who undergoes significant psychological and ethical changes over time, revealing potential vulnerabilities in authorship attribution methods.

Contribution

It demonstrates that major ethical and psychological transformations in an author can significantly reduce authorship classification accuracy, highlighting limitations of current models.

Findings

Classification accuracy drops over long time spans for the same author.

Confidence scores remain stable despite lower accuracy, indicating potential for deception.

Historical and ethical changes influence authorship attribution results.

Abstract

This paper is our attempt at answering a twofold question covering the areas of ethics and authorship analysis. Firstly, since the methods used for performing authorship analysis imply that an author can be recognized by the content he or she creates, we were interested in finding out whether it would be possible for an author identification system to correctly attribute works to authors if in the course of years they have undergone a major psychological transition. Secondly, and from the point of view of the evolution of an author's ethical values, we checked what it would mean if the authorship attribution system encounters difficulties in detecting single authorship. We set out to answer those questions through performing a binary authorship analysis task using a text classifier based on a pre-trained transformer model and a baseline method relying on conventional similarity metrics. For the test set, we chose works of Arata Osada, a Japanese educator and specialist in the history of education, with half of them being books written before the World War II and another half in the 1950s, in between which he underwent a transformation in terms of political opinions. As a result, we were able to confirm that in the case of texts authored by Arata Osada in a time span of more than 10 years, while the classification accuracy drops by a large margin and is substantially lower than for texts by other non-fiction writers, confidence scores of the predictions remain at a similar level as in the case of a shorter time span, indicating that the classifier was in many instances tricked into deciding that texts written over a time span of multiple years were actually written by two different people, which in turn leads us to believe that such a change can affect authorship analysis, and that historical events have great impact on a person's ethical outlook as expressed in their writings.