pGMM Kernel Regression and Comparisons with Boosted Trees
Ping Li, Weijie Zhao

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that the pGMM kernel improves ridge regression performance and, with parameter tuning, can rival boosted trees, while also exploring the benefits of Lp boosting for regression accuracy.
Contribution
It introduces the application of pGMM kernel in ridge regression and extends boosting methods with Lp loss functions, providing new tools for improved regression performance.
Findings
pGMM kernel performs well without tuning p.
Tuning p in pGMM enhances regression accuracy.
L_p boost with p>2 often yields best results.
Abstract
In this work, we demonstrate the advantage of the pGMM (``powered generalized min-max'') kernel in the context of (ridge) regression. In recent prior studies, the pGMM kernel has been extensively evaluated for classification tasks, for logistic regression, support vector machines, as well as deep neural networks. In this paper, we provide an experimental study on ridge regression, to compare the pGMM kernel regression with the ordinary ridge linear regression as well as the RBF kernel ridge regression. Perhaps surprisingly, even without a tuning parameter (i.e., for the power parameter of the pGMM kernel), the pGMM kernel already performs well. Furthermore, by tuning the parameter , this (deceptively simple) pGMM kernel even performs quite comparably to boosted trees. Boosting and boosted trees are very popular in machine learning practice. For regression tasks, typically,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFace and Expression Recognition · Machine Learning and Data Classification · Statistical Methods and Inference
MethodsRadial Basis Function · Linear Regression
