Evolving community structure in the international pesticide trade networks

TL;DR

This study analyzes the evolving community structures in international pesticide trade networks from 2007 to 2018, revealing regional patterns, stability differences, and key economies shaping global trade communities.

Contribution

It uncovers the distinct community structures in directed and undirected pesticide trade networks and identifies stable, region-specific core economies across categories.

Findings

Community structures show regional patterns with differences between directed and undirected networks.

Directed networks exhibit more stable community structures than undirected ones.

Key economies like European countries, the US, Canada, and Australia form stable core communities.

Abstract

The statistical properties including community structure of the international trade networks of all commodities as a whole have been studied extensively. However, the international trade networks of individual commodities often behave differently. Due to the importance of pesticides in agricultural production and food security, we investigate the evolving community structure in the international pesticide trade networks (iPTNs) of five categories from 2007 to 2018. We unveil the community structures in the undirected and directed iPTNs exhibits regional patterns. However, the regional patterns are very different for undirected and directed networks and for different categories of pesticide. Moreover, the community structure is stabler in the directed iPTNs than in the undirected iPTNs. We also extract the intrinsic community blocks for the directed international trade networks of each pesticide category. It is found that the largest intrinsic community block is the stablest that appears in every pesticide category and contains important economies (Belgium, Germany, Spain, France, United Kingdom, Italy, Netherlands, and Portugal) in Europe. Other important and stable intrinsic community blocks are Canada and the United States in North America, Argentina and Brazil in South America, and Australia and New Zealand in Oceania. These findings imply the importance of geographic distance and the complementarity of important adjacent economies in the international trade of pesticides.