An Integrated Biological Optimization framework for proton SBRT FLASH treatment planning allows dose, dose rate, and LET optimization using patient-specific ridge filters

TL;DR

This paper introduces a novel integrated optimization framework for proton FLASH radiotherapy that simultaneously optimizes dose, dose rate, and LET using patient-specific ridge filters, enhancing treatment precision and efficiency.

Contribution

The study presents a new software framework for designing patient-specific ridge filters and optimizing proton therapy plans considering dose, dose rate, and LET simultaneously.

Findings

Selective sparing of heart and lung achieved with optimized ridge filters.

Sparse ridge filters improve dose rate and LET distribution.

Significant increase in FLASH dose rate volume for critical organs.

Abstract

Purpose: Patient-specific ridge filters can modulate proton energy to obtain a conformal dose. We describe a new framework for optimization of filter design and spot maps to meet the unique demands of FLASH radiotherapy. We demonstrate an Integrated Biological Optimization IMPT (IBO-IMPT) approach for optimization of dose, dose-averaged dose rate (DADR), and dose-averaged LET (LETd). Methods: We developed inverse planning software to design patient-specific ridge filters that spread the Bragg peak from a fixed-energy, 250 MeV beam to a proximal beam-specific planning target volume. The software optimizes patient-specific ridge filter and uses a Monte Carlo calculation engine, based on Geant4, to provide dose and LET influence matrices. Plan optimization, using matRAD, accommodates the IBO-IMPT objective function considering dose, dose rate, and LET simultaneously with minimum MU constraints. The framework enables design of both regularly spaced and sparse-optimized ridge filters, which allow faster delivery and selective LET optimization. Volume distributions and histograms for dose, DADR, and LETd are compared using evaluation structures specific to the heart and lung. Results: We used IBO-IMPT to design ridge filters for a central lung tumor patient. The IBO-IMPT framework selectively spared heart and lung by reducing LET and increasing dose rate, relative to IMPT planning. Sparse-optimized ridge filters were superior to regularly spaced ridge filters in dose rate. Together, these innovations substantially increased the DADR in the heart and lung while maintaining good target coverage. The volume that received a FLASH dose rate of higher 40 Gy/second increased by 31% for heart and 50% for lung. Conclusion: This proof-of-concept study demonstrates the feasibility of using an IBO-IMPT framework to accomplish proton FLASH SBPT, accounting for dose, DADR, and LETd simultaneously.