Anomalous behaviour in loss-gradient based interpretability methods
Vinod Subramanian, Siddharth Gururani, Emmanouil Benetos, Mark Sandler

TL;DR
This paper investigates unexpected phenomena in loss-gradient based interpretability methods, revealing that occluding parts of input can sometimes improve model performance, challenging assumptions about interpretability techniques.
Contribution
The study systematically evaluates loss-gradient attribution methods and uncovers conditions under which occlusion enhances model performance, providing new insights into interpretability.
Findings
Occlusion can improve model performance in certain conditions.
Loss-gradient methods exhibit anomalous behavior across tasks.
Different occlusion levels and replacements influence interpretability results.
Abstract
Loss-gradients are used to interpret the decision making process of deep learning models. In this work, we evaluate loss-gradient based attribution methods by occluding parts of the input and comparing the performance of the occluded input to the original input. We observe that the occluded input has better performance than the original across the test dataset under certain conditions. Similar behaviour is observed in sound and image recognition tasks. We explore different loss-gradient attribution methods, occlusion levels and replacement values to explain the phenomenon of performance improvement under occlusion.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdversarial Robustness in Machine Learning · Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) · Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
MethodsTest
