Partial Disentanglement via Mechanism Sparsity
S\'ebastien Lachapelle, Simon Lacoste-Julien

TL;DR
This paper generalizes the theory of mechanism sparsity for disentanglement, introducing partial disentanglement and a new consistency relation applicable to any ground-truth graph, with practical algorithms demonstrated in simulations.
Contribution
It extends mechanism sparsity theory to all ground-truth graphs, defining partial disentanglement and a new consistency relation for more flexible disentanglement analysis.
Findings
The theory applies to any ground-truth graph.
Enforcement of graph sparsity via constrained optimization.
Successful demonstration in simulation environments.
Abstract
Disentanglement via mechanism sparsity was introduced recently as a principled approach to extract latent factors without supervision when the causal graph relating them in time is sparse, and/or when actions are observed and affect them sparsely. However, this theory applies only to ground-truth graphs satisfying a specific criterion. In this work, we introduce a generalization of this theory which applies to any ground-truth graph and specifies qualitatively how disentangled the learned representation is expected to be, via a new equivalence relation over models we call consistency. This equivalence captures which factors are expected to remain entangled and which are not based on the specific form of the ground-truth graph. We call this weaker form of identifiability partial disentanglement. The graphical criterion that allows complete disentanglement, proposed in an earlier work,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdversarial Robustness in Machine Learning · Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
