Towards Understanding Confusion and Affective States Under Communication Failures in Voice-Based Human-Machine Interaction
Sujeong Kim, Abhinav Garlapati, Jonah Lubin, Amir Tamrakar, Ajay, Divakaran

TL;DR
This research investigates users' emotional responses, especially confusion, during voice-based human-machine interactions, focusing on communication errors through two experimental studies involving audio-visual data and self-reports.
Contribution
It provides new insights into affective states during voice interactions, emphasizing confusion's role in communication failures, with comprehensive analysis of observational and self-reported data.
Findings
Confusion is a prominent affective state during communication failures.
Self-reports and observations reveal different patterns of affective responses.
Communication errors significantly impact user affective states.
Abstract
We present a series of two studies conducted to understand user's affective states during voice-based human-machine interactions. Emphasis is placed on the cases of communication errors or failures. In particular, we are interested in understanding "confusion" in relation with other affective states. The studies consist of two types of tasks: (1) related to communication with a voice-based virtual agent: speaking to the machine and understanding what the machine says, (2) non-communication related, problem-solving tasks where the participants solve puzzles and riddles but are asked to verbally explain the answers to the machine. We collected audio-visual data and self-reports of affective states of the participants. We report results of two studies and analysis of the collected data. The first study was analyzed based on the annotator's observation, and the second study was analyzed…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
