Susceptibility of Continual Learning Against Adversarial Attacks
Hikmat Khan, Pir Masoom Shah, Syed Farhan Alam Zaidi, Saif ul Islam,, Qasim Zia

TL;DR
This paper reveals that current continual learning methods are highly vulnerable to adversarial attacks, with any class being easily targeted and misclassified, raising concerns about their deployment in real-world scenarios.
Contribution
The study systematically evaluates the robustness of various continual learning approaches against adversarial attacks across different scenarios.
Findings
All classes are susceptible to misclassification under attack.
Current continual learning methods lack robustness for real-world deployment.
Adversarial vulnerabilities are present in regularization, replay, and hybrid approaches.
Abstract
Recent continual learning approaches have primarily focused on mitigating catastrophic forgetting. Nevertheless, two critical areas have remained relatively unexplored: 1) evaluating the robustness of proposed methods and 2) ensuring the security of learned tasks. This paper investigates the susceptibility of continually learned tasks, including current and previously acquired tasks, to adversarial attacks. Specifically, we have observed that any class belonging to any task can be easily targeted and misclassified as the desired target class of any other task. Such susceptibility or vulnerability of learned tasks to adversarial attacks raises profound concerns regarding data integrity and privacy. To assess the robustness of continual learning approaches, we consider continual learning approaches in all three scenarios, i.e., task-incremental learning, domain-incremental learning, and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
