Can Language Models perform Abductive Commonsense Reasoning?
Seungone Kim

TL;DR
This paper reviews methodologies for abductive commonsense reasoning, re-implements baseline models, and analyzes current approaches' weaknesses, providing insights into how language models handle this challenging task.
Contribution
It offers a comprehensive review, re-implementation of baseline models, and critical analysis of existing approaches to abductive reasoning in language models.
Findings
Current models have notable weaknesses in abductive reasoning.
Re-implemented baselines provide a benchmark for future research.
Analysis highlights areas for improvement in model reasoning capabilities.
Abstract
Abductive Reasoning is a task of inferring the most plausible hypothesis given a set of observations. In literature, the community has approached to solve this challenge by classifying/generating a likely hypothesis that does not contradict with a past observation and future observation. Some of the most well-known benchmarks that tackle this problem are aNLI and aNLG (pronounced as alpha-NLI and alpha-NLG). In this report, I review over some of the methodologies that were attempted to solve this challenge, re-implement the baseline models, and analyze some of the weaknesses that current approaches have. The code and the re-implemented results are available at this link.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsTopic Modeling · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Semantic Web and Ontologies
