Modeling the Lyman-$\alpha$ forest with Eulerian and SPH hydrodynamical methods
Sol\`ene Chabanier, J.D. Emberson, Zarija Luki\'c, Jesus Pulido,, Salman Habib, Esteban Rangel, Jean Sexton, Nicholas Frontiere, Michael, Buehlmann

TL;DR
This study compares Eulerian and SPH hydrodynamical simulation codes for modeling the Lyman-alpha forest, demonstrating high agreement and highlighting biases introduced by standard SPH methods, especially at high redshifts.
Contribution
It provides a detailed comparison of two advanced simulation approaches, revealing the impact of density reconstruction methods on flux statistics accuracy.
Findings
Overall agreement within observational uncertainties
Less than 1% difference in 1D flux power spectrum
SPH kernel biases are significant at high redshifts
Abstract
We compare two state-of-the-art numerical codes to study the overall accuracy in modeling the intergalactic medium and reproducing Lyman- forest observables for DESI and high-resolution data sets. The codes employ different approaches to solving both gravity and modeling the gas hydrodynamics. The first code, Nyx, solves the Poisson equation using the Particle-Mesh (PM) method and the Euler equations using a finite volume method. The second code, \CRKHACC, uses a Tree-PM method to solve for gravity, and an improved Lagrangian smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) technique, where fluid elements are modeled with particles, to treat the intergalactic gas. We compare the convergence behavior of the codes in flux statistics as well as the degree to which the codes agree in the converged limit. We find good agreement overall with differences being less than observational…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
