Killing a Vortex
Dimitrios M. Thilikos, Sebastian Wiederrecht

TL;DR
This paper classifies all graphs for which the structure theorem of Robertson and Seymour can be simplified by avoiding vortices, and uses this to determine when counting perfect matchings is polynomially feasible.
Contribution
It provides a full classification of graphs where vortices can be avoided in the structure theorem, and develops an algorithm for counting perfect matchings in certain minor-closed graph classes.
Findings
Identifies graphs $ extit{S}_t$ that characterize when vortices are necessary.
Shows that counting perfect matchings is polynomial in $ extit{S}_t$-minor-free graphs.
Provides a sharp complexity dichotomy for counting perfect matchings in minor-closed classes.
Abstract
The Graph Minors Structure Theorem of Robertson and Seymour asserts that, for every graph every -minor-free graph can be obtained by clique-sums of ``almost embeddable'' graphs. Here a graph is ``almost embeddable'' if it can be obtained from a graph of bounded Euler-genus by pasting graphs of bounded pathwidth in an ``orderly fashion'' into a bounded number of faces, called the \textit{vortices}, and then adding a bounded number of additional vertices, called \textit{apices}, with arbitrary neighborhoods. Our main result is a {full classification} of all graphs for which the use of vortices in the theorem above can be avoided. To this end we identify a (parametric) graph and prove that all -minor-free graphs can be obtained by clique-sums of graphs embeddable in a surface of bounded Euler-genus after deleting a bounded number of vertices.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Graph Theory Research · Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs · Limits and Structures in Graph Theory
