
TL;DR
This paper determines the optimal fixed guessing strategy for the number-guessing game MOO using exhaustive search, establishing it as a game with a strongest fixed strategy and analyzing its properties.
Contribution
It is the first to find the minimum strategy for MOO with a larger search space and to analyze the game's fixed strategies and their effectiveness.
Findings
The minimum strategy minimizes average guesses in MOO.
No fixed strategy beats a 0.5 winning rate against the maximum winning rate strategy.
MOO has a strongest fixed strategy.
Abstract
We calculated a fixed strategy that minimizes the average number of guesses (minimum strategy) for the number-guessing game MOO by exhaustive search. Although the minimum strategy for a similar game, mastermind, has been reported, this study seems to be the first to find the minimum strategy for MOO with a larger search space. When two players play against each other in MOO, the minimum strategy is not always the strongest fixed strategy. First, we compute a fixed strategy that has the maximum winning rate when played against the minimum strategy. Then we confirm that there is no fixed strategy with a winning rate exceeding 0.5 against this strategy. This result shows that MOO is a game with the strongest fixed strategy.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsArtificial Intelligence in Games · Video Analysis and Summarization · Gambling Behavior and Treatments
