Closing the Gap Between Directed Hopsets and Shortcut Sets
Aaron Bernstein, Nicole Wein

TL;DR
This paper improves the understanding of the relationship between shortcut sets and hopsets in directed graphs, showing that small hopsets with near-optimal hopbound and linear size exist, matching the best known bounds for shortcut sets.
Contribution
It closes the gap between shortcut sets and hopsets by constructing small hopsets with optimal hopbound, matching the tradeoff bounds of shortcut sets, and improves bounds for approximate distance preservers.
Findings
Existence of $( ilde{O}(n^{1/3}), ext{epsilon})$ hopsets with $O(n)$ edges
Achieves a smooth tradeoff between hopset size and hopbound
Implications for improved approximate distance preservers
Abstract
For an n-vertex directed graph , a -\emph{shortcut set} is a set of additional edges such that has the same transitive closure as , and for every pair , there is a -path in with at most edges. A natural generalization of shortcut sets to distances is a -\emph{hopset} , where the requirement is that and have the same shortest-path distances, and for every , there is a -approximate shortest path in with at most edges. There is a large literature on the tradeoff between the size of a shortcut set / hopset and the value of . We highlight the most natural point on this tradeoff: what is the minimum value of , such that for any graph , there exists a -shortcut set (or a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Graph Theory Research · Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs · Data Management and Algorithms
