Analysis of two Binomial Proportions in Non-inferiority Confirmatory Trials
Hassan Lakkis, Andrew Lakkis

TL;DR
This paper introduces an exact likelihood score (ELS) test for comparing two binomial proportions in non-inferiority trials, demonstrating its advantages over traditional methods in accuracy and computational efficiency.
Contribution
The paper develops and validates an ELS test with improved control of type I error rates and faster computation for non-inferiority binomial comparisons.
Findings
ELS method maintains nominal type I error levels more accurately.
Compared to asymptotic methods, ELS shows better performance in unbalanced samples.
ELS computation is fast, taking less than 30 seconds in most cases.
Abstract
In this paper, we propose considering an exact likelihood score (ELS) test for non-inferiority comparison and we derive its test-based confidence interval for the difference between two independent binomial proportions. The p-value for this test is obtained by using exact binomial probabilities with the nuisance parameter being replaced by its restricted maximum likelihood estimate. Calculated type I errors revealed that the proposed ELS method has important advantages for non-inferiority comparisons over popular asymptotic methods for adequately powered confirmatory clinical trials, at 80% or 90% statistical power. For unbalanced sample sizes of the compared treatment groups, the type I errors for the asymptotic score method were shown to be higher than the nominal level in a systematic pattern over a range of the true proportions, but the ELS method did not suffer from such a problem.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStatistical Methods in Clinical Trials · Advanced Causal Inference Techniques · Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
