A Systematic Review and Thematic Analysis of Community-Collaborative Approaches to Computing Research
Ned Cooper, Tiffanie Horne, Gillian Hayes, Courtney Heldreth, Michal, Lahav, Jess Scon Holbrook, Lauren Wilcox

TL;DR
This paper systematically reviews 47 years of community-collaborative computing research, identifying key themes, challenges, and tensions, and offers methodological guidance to better center communities in HCI projects.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive thematic analysis of community-collaborative approaches, highlighting challenges and proposing methods to improve community engagement in computing research.
Findings
Seven themes identified in project evolution.
Tensions related to researcher power and community positioning.
Guidelines proposed for community-centered research practices.
Abstract
HCI researchers have been gradually shifting attention from individual users to communities when engaging in research, design, and system development. However, our field has yet to establish a cohesive, systematic understanding of the challenges, benefits, and commitments of community-collaborative approaches to research. We conducted a systematic review and thematic analysis of 47 computing research papers discussing participatory research with communities for the development of technological artifacts and systems, published over the last two decades. From this review, we identified seven themes associated with the evolution of a project: from establishing community partnerships to sustaining results. Our findings suggest that several tensions characterize these projects, many of which relate to the power and position of researchers, and the computing research environment, relative to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
