Mixing is hard for triangle-free reflexive graphs
Hyobeen Kim, Jae-baek Lee, Mark Siggers

TL;DR
This paper proves that the problem of determining connectivity in hom-graphs for certain triangle-free reflexive graphs is computationally hard, specifically coNP-complete, with implications for related simplicial complex mappings.
Contribution
It establishes the computational complexity of Mix(H) for triangle-free reflexive graphs with cycles, linking it to NP-hardness via reductions involving simplicial complexes.
Findings
Mix(H) is coNP-complete for certain graphs
NonFlat(H) is NP-complete when the clique complex has non-trivial homology
Complexity results connect graph homomorphism problems to topological properties
Abstract
In the problem one is given a graph and must decide if the Hom-graph is connected. We show that if is a triangle-free reflexive graph with at least one cycle, is -complete. The main part of this is a reduction to the problem for a simplicial complex , in which one is given a simplicial complex and must decide if there are any simplicial maps from to under which some -cycles of maps to homologically non-trivial cycle of . We show that for any reflexive graph , if the clique complex of has a free, non-trivial homology group , then is -complete.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsTopological and Geometric Data Analysis · Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology · Memory and Neural Mechanisms
