TL;DR
This paper investigates the intrinsic manifold structures of radiological images compared to natural images, revealing their impact on deep learning generalization and emphasizing the need for domain-specific models.
Contribution
It provides the first comparative analysis of intrinsic manifold dimensionality in radiological versus natural images and links these properties to generalization challenges in medical imaging.
Findings
Radiological images have lower intrinsic dimensions than natural images.
Generalization ability correlates more strongly with intrinsic dimensionality in medical images.
Radiological images present unique learning challenges requiring tailored deep learning architectures.
Abstract
The manifold hypothesis is a core mechanism behind the success of deep learning, so understanding the intrinsic manifold structure of image data is central to studying how neural networks learn from the data. Intrinsic dataset manifolds and their relationship to learning difficulty have recently begun to be studied for the common domain of natural images, but little such research has been attempted for radiological images. We address this here. First, we compare the intrinsic manifold dimensionality of radiological and natural images. We also investigate the relationship between intrinsic dimensionality and generalization ability over a wide range of datasets. Our analysis shows that natural image datasets generally have a higher number of intrinsic dimensions than radiological images. However, the relationship between generalization ability and intrinsic dimensionality is much stronger…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
