Some Tradeoffs of Competition in Grant Contests
Kyle R. Myers

TL;DR
This paper investigates how competition in grant contests influences scientists' effort, showing that effort directed towards fundraising can have inherent scientific value, thus not necessarily reducing research effort.
Contribution
It combines survey data analysis with theoretical models to demonstrate that socially valuable effort in grant contests can alter traditional views on competition's effects.
Findings
Scientists' fundraising effort has inherent scientific value.
Increased competition can lead to socially valuable effort.
Effort externalities can improve overall research productivity.
Abstract
When funding public goods, resources are often allocated via mechanisms that resemble contests, especially in the case of research grants. A common critique of these contests is that they induce ``too much'' effort from participants. This need not be true if the effort in the contest is itself directed towards the public good. This papers analyzes survey data on scientists' time use and finds that scientists allocate their time in a way that is consistent with fundraising effort (e.g., grant writing) having inherent scientific value -- scientists who spend more time fundraising do not spent significantly less time on research even after conditioning on confounding factors. Theoretical models of contests are used to show that the presence of such a positive effort externality, where scientists generate social value when pursuing grants, changes the relationship between competition and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHealth and Medical Research Impacts · scientometrics and bibliometrics research
