On the Non-Gaussianity of Sea Surface Elevations
Alicia Nieto-Reyes

TL;DR
This paper empirically demonstrates that sea surface elevations are often non-Gaussian, challenging the common assumption in literature, by analyzing buoy data and showing deviations from Gaussianity in over 80% of cases.
Contribution
The study provides the first comprehensive empirical evidence that sea surface elevations are frequently non-Gaussian, using a whole-process analysis rather than just marginals.
Findings
Over 80% of buoy data reject Gaussianity
Sea surface elevations are non-Gaussian as a whole process
One-dimensional marginals appear Gaussian despite the non-Gaussianity of the process
Abstract
The sea surface elevations are generally stated as Gaussian processes in the literature. To show the inaccuracy of this statement, an empirical study of the buoys in the US coast at a random day is performed, which results in rejecting the null hypothesis of Gaussianity in over 80 of the cases. The analysis pursued relates to a recent one by the author in which the heights of sea waves are proved to be non-Gaussian. It is similar in that the Gaussianity of the process is studied as a whole and not just of its one-dimensional marginal, as it is common in the literature. It differs, however, in that the analysis of the sea surface elevations is harder from a statistical point of view, as the one-dimensional marginals are commonly Gaussian, which is observed throughout the study.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsScientific Research and Discoveries · Ocean Waves and Remote Sensing · Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
