The nature of properly human mathematics
David Ruelle

TL;DR
This paper explores the nature of human mathematics, emphasizing its dependence on axioms, its evolving yet universal features, and its structural organization influenced by cognitive constraints.
Contribution
It introduces a perspective that human mathematics is shaped by cognitive biases and structural organization, highlighting universal features despite its evolution over time.
Findings
Human mathematics is limited by cognitive and linguistic factors.
Mathematical knowledge is organized structurally due to brain functions.
Universal features of human mathematics persist despite its historical evolution.
Abstract
We claim that human mathematics is only a limited part of the consequences of the chosen basic axioms. Properly human mathematics varies with time but appears to have universal features which we try to analyze. In particular the functioning of the human brain privileges concept naming and short formulations. This leads to organizing mathematical knowledge structurally. We consider briefly the problem of non-mathematical sciences.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCognitive Science and Education Research
