Perspectives and constraints on neural network models of neurobiological processes
Arsenii Onuchin

TL;DR
This paper reviews neural network models of brain functions, discussing their biological realism, recent advances, and the constraints needed to improve their neurobiological credibility.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive discussion of different neural models and identifies key aspects for enhancing their biological plausibility.
Findings
Highlighting recent biologically inspired neural network models
Identifying constraints for improving neurobiological realism
Discussing various neural network architectures and mechanisms
Abstract
Artificial and natural neural network models are a new toolkit which could be potentially have been used for clarifying of complex brain functions. To attend this goal, such models need to be neurobiologically realistic. However, although neural networks have advanced keenly in recent decades their strict similarity in aspects of brain anatomy and physiology is imperfect. In this work we discuss different types of neural models, including localist, attractor and deep network models, and also identify aspects under which their biological credibility can be improved. These conditions range from the choice of neuron models and of mechanisms of synaptic plasticity and learning to implementation of inhibition and control, along with network architectures (modularity, connectivity). We highlight recent advances in biologically inspired neural network models and their constraints.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNeural Networks and Applications · Neural dynamics and brain function · Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
