Hard X-ray emission from the eastern jet of SS 433 powering the W50 `Manatee' nebula: Evidence for particle re-acceleration
Samar Safi-Harb, Brydyn Mac Intyre, Shuo Zhang, Isaac Pope, Shuhan, Zhang, Nathan Saffold, Kaya Mori, Eric V. Gotthelf, Felix Aharonian, Matthew, Band, Chelsea Braun, Ke Fang, Charles Hailey, Melania Nynka, Chang D. Rho

TL;DR
This study reveals hard X-ray emission and particle re-acceleration in the eastern jet of SS 433 powering W50, challenging classical acceleration models and suggesting ongoing particle injection and re-acceleration processes.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed broadband X-ray analysis of W50's eastern jet, demonstrating evidence for particle re-acceleration and challenging existing acceleration theories.
Findings
Detection of non-thermal X-ray emission up to 30 keV
Hard spectral index indicating particle re-acceleration
Magnetic field estimates consistent with re-acceleration models
Abstract
We present a broadband X-ray study of W50 (`the Manatee nebula'), the complex region powered by the microquasar SS 433, that provides a test-bed for several important astrophysical processes. The W50 nebula, a Galactic PeVatron candidate, is classified as a supernova remnant but has an unusual double-lobed morphology likely associated with the jets from SS 433. Using NuSTAR, XMM-Newton, and Chandra observations of the inner eastern lobe of W50, we have detected hard non-thermal X-ray emission up to 30 keV, originating from a few-arcminute size knotty region (`Head') located 18 (29 pc for a distance of 5.5 kpc) east of SS 433, and constrain its photon index to 1.580.05 (0.5-30 keV band). The index gradually steepens eastward out to the radio `ear' where thermal soft X-ray emission with a temperature 0.2 keV dominates. The hard X-ray knots mark…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
