Dual constraints with ALMA: new [O III] 88 ${\rm \mu}$m and dust-continuum observations reveal the ISM conditions of luminous LBGs at $z \sim 7$
Joris Witstok, Renske Smit, Roberto Maiolino, Nimisha Kumari, Manuel, Aravena, Leindert Boogaard, Rychard Bouwens, Stefano Carniani, Jacqueline A., Hodge, Gareth C. Jones, Mauro Stefanon, Paul van der Werf, and Sander Schouws

TL;DR
This study uses new ALMA [O III] 88 μm and dust continuum observations of luminous z~7 LBGs to explore their ISM conditions, revealing spatially extended [C II] emission and challenging existing nebular models.
Contribution
It provides the first combined [O III] and dust continuum analysis of luminous z~7 LBGs, revealing spatial gas distributions and model discrepancies.
Findings
[O III] emission correlates with optical line equivalent widths.
[C II] emission is more extended than [O III], indicating different gas phases.
Models require alpha/Fe enhancement and near-solar oxygen to match [O III] strength.
Abstract
We present new [O III] 88 m observations of five bright Lyman-break galaxies spectroscopically confirmed by ALMA through the [C II] 158 m line, unlike recent [O III] detections where Lyman- was used. This nearly doubles the sample of Epoch of Reionisation galaxies with robust () detections of [C II] and [O III]. We perform a multi-wavelength comparison with new deep HST images of the rest-frame UV, whose compact morphology aligns well with [O III] tracing ionised gas. By contrast, we find more spatially extended [C II] emission likely produced in neutral gas, as indicated by a [N II] 205 m non-detection in one source. We find a positive correlation between the equivalent width of the optical [O III] and H lines and the [O III]/[C II] ratio, as seen in local metal-poor dwarf galaxies. Cloudy models of a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
