Goodness in $n$-angulated categories
Sebastian H. Martensen

TL;DR
This paper extends the concepts of good morphisms from triangulated categories to $n$-angulated categories and proves a key property for morphisms in certain $n$-angulated categories.
Contribution
It generalizes the notions of good morphisms to $n$-angulated categories and establishes that all morphisms of $n$-angles are middling good in specific categories.
Findings
All morphisms of $n$-angles are middling good for $n>3$.
Generalization of morphism properties from triangulated to $n$-angulated categories.
Provides foundational results for the structure of $n$-angulated categories.
Abstract
We generalise the notions of good, middling good, and Verdier good morphisms of distinguished triangles in triangulated categories, first introduced by Neeman, to the setting of -angulated categories, introduced in Geiss, Keller, and Oppermann. We then prove that all morphisms of -angles in an -cluster tilting -angulated category are middling good for .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAlgebraic structures and combinatorial models · Advanced Topics in Algebra · Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology
