Data Redaction from Pre-trained GANs
Zhifeng Kong, Kamalika Chaudhuri

TL;DR
This paper introduces post-training algorithms for redacting specific data from GANs, enabling the models to avoid generating undesirable samples efficiently without full retraining.
Contribution
The work presents novel post-editing methods for GANs to perform data redaction, distinct from data deletion, improving efficiency and effectiveness.
Findings
Algorithms outperform data deletion baselines
Redaction maintains high generation quality
Methods are computationally efficient
Abstract
Large pre-trained generative models are known to occasionally output undesirable samples, which undermines their trustworthiness. The common way to mitigate this is to re-train them differently from scratch using different data or different regularization -- which uses a lot of computational resources and does not always fully address the problem. In this work, we take a different, more compute-friendly approach and investigate how to post-edit a model after training so that it ''redacts'', or refrains from outputting certain kinds of samples. We show that redaction is a fundamentally different task from data deletion, and data deletion may not always lead to redaction. We then consider Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), and provide three different algorithms for data redaction that differ on how the samples to be redacted are described. Extensive evaluations on real-world image…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis · Machine Learning in Healthcare · AI in cancer detection
