Euclid: Forecasts from the void-lensing cross-correlation
M. Bonici, C. Carbone, S. Davini, P. Vielzeuf, L. Paganin, V. Cardone,, N. Hamaus, A. Pisani, A.J. Hawken, A. Kovacs, S. Nadathur, S. Contarini, G., Verza, I. Tutusaus, F. Marulli, L. Moscardini, M. Aubert, C. Giocoli, A., Pourtsidou, S. Camera, S. Escoffier, A. Caminata

TL;DR
This paper forecasts how combining void clustering, galaxy lensing, and their cross-correlation with Euclid data can significantly improve constraints on cosmological parameters, including neutrino mass and dark energy evolution.
Contribution
First forecasts including void-lensing cross-correlation for Euclid, demonstrating improved parameter constraints and joint analysis benefits.
Findings
Void clustering constraints on $h$ and $\\Omega_b$ are competitive with galaxy lensing.
Including void-lensing cross-correlation improves parameter constraints by 10-15%.
Combining probes increases the Figure of Merit by up to 25% and the overall FoM by a factor of 4.
Abstract
The Euclid space telescope will survey a large dataset of cosmic voids traced by dense samples of galaxies. In this work we estimate its expected performance when exploiting angular photometric void clustering, galaxy weak lensing and their cross-correlation. To this aim, we implement a Fisher matrix approach tailored for voids from the Euclid photometric dataset and present the first forecasts on cosmological parameters that include the void-lensing correlation. We examine two different probe settings, pessimistic and optimistic, both for void clustering and galaxy lensing. We carry out forecast analyses in four model cosmologies, accounting for a varying total neutrino mass, , and a dynamical dark energy (DE) equation of state, , described by the CPL parametrisation. We find that void clustering constraints on and are competitive with galaxy lensing alone,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
