Arithmetically equivalent number fields have approximately the same successive minima
Floris Vermeulen

TL;DR
This paper proves that arithmetically equivalent number fields of the same degree have approximately the same successive minima, differing only by a constant depending on the degree, with examples showing exact equality is not always possible.
Contribution
It establishes a bound on the difference of successive minima for arithmetically equivalent number fields, advancing understanding of their geometric properties.
Findings
Successive minima are approximately equal for arithmetically equivalent fields.
The difference in successive minima is bounded by a constant depending only on the degree.
Examples demonstrate that exact equality of successive minima does not always hold.
Abstract
Let and be arithmetically equivalent number fields, both of degree . We prove that and have the same successive minima, up to a constant depending only on . We give examples showing that one cannot expect equality.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAnalytic Number Theory Research · Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory
