Tensor Recovery Based on A Novel Non-convex Function Minimax Logarithmic Concave Penalty Function

TL;DR

This paper introduces a novel non-convex Minimax Logarithmic Concave Penalty (MLCP) function for tensor recovery, providing theoretical properties, equivalence theorems, and algorithms that outperform existing methods in experiments.

Contribution

The paper proposes the MLCP function for tensor recovery, along with equivalence theorems and PALM algorithms, advancing non-convex tensor recovery techniques.

Findings

MLCP outperforms logarithmic function in minimization tasks

Proposed algorithms converge to critical points

Experimental results show superior tensor recovery performance

Abstract

Non-convex relaxation methods have been widely used in tensor recovery problems, and compared with convex relaxation methods, can achieve better recovery results. In this paper, a new non-convex function, Minimax Logarithmic Concave Penalty (MLCP) function, is proposed, and some of its intrinsic properties are analyzed, among which it is interesting to find that the Logarithmic function is an upper bound of the MLCP function. The proposed function is generalized to tensor cases, yielding tensor MLCP and weighted tensor $L\gamma$-norm. Consider that its explicit solution cannot be obtained when applying it directly to the tensor recovery problem. Therefore, the corresponding equivalence theorems to solve such problem are given, namely, tensor equivalent MLCP theorem and equivalent weighted tensor $L\gamma$-norm theorem. In addition, we propose two EMLCP-based models for classic tensor recovery problems, namely low-rank tensor completion (LRTC) and tensor robust principal component analysis (TRPCA), and design proximal alternate linearization minimization (PALM) algorithms to solve them individually. Furthermore, based on the Kurdyka-{\L}ojasiwicz property, it is proved that the solution sequence of the proposed algorithm has finite length and converges to the critical point globally. Finally, Extensive experiments show that proposed algorithm achieve good results, and it is confirmed that the MLCP function is indeed better than the Logarithmic function in the minimization problem, which is consistent with the analysis of theoretical properties.