AI-based computer-aided diagnostic system of chest digital tomography synthesis: Demonstrating comparative advantage with X-ray-based AI systems

TL;DR

This study develops and compares AI-based diagnostic systems using chest digital tomosynthesis (CDTS) and chest X-ray (CXR), demonstrating that CDTS-based AI improves lung lesion detection performance over CXR-based AI.

Contribution

The paper introduces a novel AI CAD system based on CDTS images and provides a comparative analysis showing its superior performance over traditional CXR-based AI systems.

Findings

CDTS-based AI achieved higher sensitivity and accuracy for tuberculosis detection.

CDTS-based AI improved pneumonia detection sensitivity by 8.7%.

Performance gains were achieved without loss of accuracy.

Abstract

Compared with chest X-ray (CXR) imaging, which is a single image projected from the front of the patient, chest digital tomosynthesis (CDTS) imaging can be more advantageous for lung lesion detection because it acquires multiple images projected from multiple angles of the patient. Various clinical comparative analysis and verification studies have been reported to demonstrate this, but there were no artificial intelligence (AI)-based comparative analysis studies. Existing AI-based computer-aided detection (CAD) systems for lung lesion diagnosis have been developed mainly based on CXR images; however, CAD-based on CDTS, which uses multi-angle images of patients in various directions, has not been proposed and verified for its usefulness compared to CXR-based counterparts. This study develops/tests a CDTS-based AI CAD system to detect lung lesions to demonstrate performance improvements compared to CXR-based AI CAD. We used multiple projection images as input for the CDTS-based AI model and a single-projection image as input for the CXR-based AI model to fairly compare and evaluate the performance between models. The proposed CDTS-based AI CAD system yielded sensitivities of 0.782 and 0.785 and accuracies of 0.895 and 0.837 for the performance of detecting tuberculosis and pneumonia, respectively, against normal subjects. These results show higher performance than sensitivities of 0.728 and 0.698 and accuracies of 0.874 and 0.826 for detecting tuberculosis and pneumonia through the CXR-based AI CAD, which only uses a single projection image in the frontal direction. We found that CDTS-based AI CAD improved the sensitivity of tuberculosis and pneumonia by 5.4% and 8.7% respectively, compared to CXR-based AI CAD without loss of accuracy. Therefore, we comparatively prove that CDTS-based AI CAD technology can improve performance more than CXR, enhancing the clinical applicability of CDTS.