Hardness of Interval Scheduling on Unrelated Machines
Danny Hermelin, Yuval Itzhaki, Hendrik Molter, Dvir Shabtay

TL;DR
This paper establishes the computational hardness of Interval Scheduling on Unrelated Machines, showing W[1]-hardness with respect to the number of machines and NP-completeness for the unweighted case, resolving longstanding open problems.
Contribution
It proves W[1]-hardness for parameterized complexity based on the number of machines and NP-completeness for the unweighted problem, answering open questions in the field.
Findings
W[1]-hardness when parameterized by the number of machines
NP-completeness of the unweighted version
Resolution of open problems from prior research
Abstract
We provide new (parameterized) computational hardness results for Interval Scheduling on Unrelated Machines. It is a classical scheduling problem motivated from just-in-time or lean manufacturing, where the goal is to complete jobs exactly at their deadline. We are given jobs and machines. Each job has a deadline, a weight, and a processing time that may be different on each machine. The goal is find a schedule that maximized the total weight of jobs completed exactly at their deadline. Note that this uniquely defines a processing time interval for each job on each machine. Interval Scheduling on Unrelated Machines is closely related to coloring interval graphs and has been thoroughly studied for several decades. However, as pointed out by Mnich and van Bevern [Computers \& Operations Research, 2018], the parameterized complexity for the number of machines as a parameter…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsScheduling and Optimization Algorithms · Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs · Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
