Causal Identification for Complex Functional Longitudinal Studies
Andrew Ying

TL;DR
This paper introduces a nonparametric causal identification framework for complex functional longitudinal data in medical research, addressing feedback loops and time-varying outcomes with advanced mathematical tools.
Contribution
It generalizes classical causal inference methods to handle uncountably infinite feedbacks in functional longitudinal data using measure theory and stochastic processes.
Findings
Framework successfully handles uncountably infinite feedbacks.
Simulation results demonstrate the method's effectiveness.
Addresses gaps in current causal inference methodologies.
Abstract
Real-time monitoring in modern medical research introduces functional longitudinal data, characterized by continuous-time measurements of outcomes, treatments, and confounders. This complexity leads to uncountably infinite treatment-confounder feedbacks, which traditional causal inference methodologies cannot handle. Inspired by the coarsened data framework, we adopt stochastic process theory, measure theory, and net convergence to propose a nonparametric causal identification framework. This framework generalizes classical g-computation, inverse probability weighting, and doubly robust formulas, accommodating time-varying outcomes subject to mortality and censoring for functional longitudinal data. We examine our framework through Monte Carlo simulations. Our approach addresses significant gaps in current methodologies, providing a solution for functional longitudinal data and paving…
Peer Reviews
Decision·ICLR 2025 Poster
Treatment effect on functional longitudinal data seems to be an understudied subject. This research nicely fills the gap of existing works. The resulting G-computation can be quite straightforwardly approximated using observations under simulation settings.
The way this paper is written obscures its main ideas (at least to a general, non-expert reader). There are many terms and phrases used without clear explanation (e.g., "g-computation", "counterfactual time-to-event endpoint"). This restricts the range of potential readers of this paper. **The experiments are limited to only simulation data and only validate the G-computation formula**. The literature review of this paper (section 2) does not seem to provide much information of existing wor
This paper establishes a new causal identification framework for continuous-time longitudinal studies with functional data, and provides clear and concise theoretical demonstration. I believe that this framework will be of interest to causal inference and machine learning communities.
1. The numerical experiment might be an over-simplification of the survival analysis scenario since neither mortality nor censoring are taken into consideration. 2. What is the causal structure that the framework is focusing on? Specifically, why set $Y(t)$ (outcome of interest) to be a subset of $L(t)$ (measured confounders)? I might misunderstood but are we assuming that previous outcome will impact the current treatment assignment (since confounders, from my understanding, will impact treatm
The approach is nonparametric and it accommodates functional treatment processes A(t) and functional confounders L(t), as well as functional response Y(t).
The paper is hard to follow and the connection of the event-time T to the outcome Y(t) is unclear.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMental Health Research Topics
