Relative Survivable Network Design
Michael Dinitz, Ama Koranteng, Guy Kortsarz

TL;DR
This paper introduces new variants of network design problems focusing on relative fault-tolerance, providing the first approximation algorithms and novel technical tools such as local weak supermodularity and a new decomposition method.
Contribution
It defines and studies relative survivable network design problems, offering the first approximation algorithms and new analytical techniques for these variants.
Findings
Approximation algorithms for unweighted and weighted relative $k$-ECSS.
A 27/4-approximation for single-demand relative survivable network design.
Introduction of local weak supermodularity and a new decomposition approach.
Abstract
One of the most important and well-studied settings for network design is edge-connectivity requirements. This encompasses uniform demands such as the Minimum -Edge-Connected Spanning Subgraph problem (-ECSS), as well as nonuniform demands such as the Survivable Network Design problem. A weakness of these formulations, though, is that we are not able to ask for fault-tolerance larger than the connectivity. We introduce and study new variants of these problems under a notion of relative fault-tolerance. Informally, we require not that two nodes are connected if there are a bounded number of faults (as in the classical setting), but that two nodes are connected if there are a bounded number of faults and the two nodes are connected in the underlying graph post-faults. That is, the subgraph we build must "behave" identically to the underlying graph with respect to connectivity after…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
