How do we optimally sample model grids of exoplanet spectra?
Chloe Fisher, Kevin Heng

TL;DR
This paper compares different sampling methods for atmospheric model grids in exoplanet spectra analysis, showing that random and Latin hypercube sampling are more efficient than linear sampling, and highlighting potential biases in traditional interpolation methods.
Contribution
It introduces and evaluates alternative sampling techniques for model grids, demonstrating their advantages over linear sampling in exoplanet atmospheric characterization.
Findings
Random and Latin hypercube sampling outperform linear sampling in high-dimensional models.
Linear interpolation can bias posterior distributions, especially for non-linear parameters.
Information content analysis identifies key spectral features for parameter detection.
Abstract
The construction and implementation of atmospheric model grids is a popular tool in exoplanet characterisation. These typically vary a number of parameters linearly, containing one model for every combination of parameter values. Here we investigate alternative methods of sampling parameters, including random sampling and Latin hypercube (LH) sampling, and how these compare to linearly sampled grids. We use a random forest to analyse the performance of these grids for two different models, as well as investigate the information content of the particular model grid from Goyal et al. 2019. We also use nested-sampling to implement mock atmospheric retrievals on simulated JWST transmission spectra by interpolating on linearly sampled model grids. Our results show that random or LH sampling out-performs linear sampling in parameter predictability for our higher dimensional models, requiring…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
