Inference on the Best Policies with Many Covariates
Waverly Wei, Yuqing Zhou, Zeyu Zheng, Jingshen Wang

TL;DR
This paper introduces a resampling-based inference method that corrects for winner's curse and handles many covariates, providing accurate evaluation of the best policies in large datasets.
Contribution
It proposes a novel, robust inference procedure that addresses winner's curse and covariate complexity in policy effect estimation, with proven asymptotic validity.
Findings
Accurate point estimates and confidence intervals achieved.
Method performs well in finite-sample Monte Carlo simulations.
Effective in empirical studies on charitable giving and employment programs.
Abstract
Understanding the impact of the most effective policies or treatments on a response variable of interest is desirable in many empirical works in economics, statistics and other disciplines. Due to the widespread winner's curse phenomenon, conventional statistical inference assuming that the top policies are chosen independent of the random sample may lead to overly optimistic evaluations of the best policies. In recent years, given the increased availability of large datasets, such an issue can be further complicated when researchers include many covariates to estimate the policy or treatment effects in an attempt to control for potential confounders. In this manuscript, to simultaneously address the above-mentioned issues, we propose a resampling-based procedure that not only lifts the winner's curse in evaluating the best policies observed in a random sample, but also is robust to the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Causal Inference Techniques
