Boltzmann or Bogoliubov? Approaches Compared in Gravitational Particle Production
Kunio Kaneta, Sung Mook Lee, and Kin-ya Oda

TL;DR
This paper compares the Boltzmann and Bogoliubov approaches to gravitational particle production after inflation, showing they agree at high momenta but differ in handling vacuum production during inflation, with the Bogoliubov method capturing non-perturbative effects.
Contribution
It provides a detailed comparison of the two methods, including analytical and numerical results, highlighting the strengths and limitations of each in different regimes.
Findings
Both approaches agree for high-momentum particle production during reheating.
The Boltzmann approach cannot compute vacuum particle production during inflation.
Analytic spectra for low-momentum scalar particles are derived from the Bogoliubov approach.
Abstract
Gravitational particle production is a minimal contribution to reheating the Universe after the end of inflation. To study this production channel, two different approaches have commonly been considered, one of which is based on the Boltzmann equation, and the other is based on the Bogoliubov transformation. Each of these has pros and cons in practice. The collision term in the Boltzmann equation can be computed based on quantum field theory in the Minkowski spacetime, and thus many techniques have been developed so far. On the other hand, the Bogoliubov approach may deal with the particle production beyond the perturbation theory and is able to take into account the effect of the curved spacetime, whereas in many cases one should rely on numerical methods, such as lattice computation. We show by explicit numerical and analytical computations of the purely gravitational production of a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
