Is [Y/Mg] a Reliable Age Diagnostic for FGK Stars?
Travis A. Berger, Jennifer L. van Saders, Daniel Huber, Eric, Gaidos, Joshua E. Schlieder, Zachary R. Claytor

TL;DR
This study evaluates the [Y/Mg] ratio as an age indicator for FGK stars, finding it most precise for solar twins but also useful across a broader stellar range, with systematic uncertainties considered.
Contribution
It demonstrates the applicability and limitations of the [Y/Mg] ratio as an age diagnostic for diverse FGK stars, extending previous findings beyond solar twins.
Findings
[Y/Mg] is most precise for solar twins with a slope of -0.0370 dex/Gyr.
A systematic uncertainty of 1.5 Gyr is recommended for age estimates using [Y/Mg].
The [Y/Mg] Clock shows potential as an age indicator for FGK stars beyond solar twins.
Abstract
Current spectroscopic surveys are producing large catalogs of chemical abundances for stars of all types. The yttrium to magnesium ratio, [Y/Mg], has emerged as a candidate age indicator for solar twins in the local stellar neighborhood. However, it is unclear whether it is a viable age diagnostic for more diverse stellar types, so we investigate [Y/Mg] as an age indicator for the FGK-type planet host stars observed by . We find that the [Y/Mg] "Clock" is most precise for solar twins, with a [Y/Mg]/Age slope of = 0.0370 0.0071 dex/Gyr and = 2.6 Gyr. We attribute the lower precision compared to literature results to non-solar twins contaminating our solar twin sample and recommend a 1.5 Gyr systematic uncertainty for stellar ages derived with any [Y/Mg]-Age relation. We also analyzed the [Y/Mg] Clock as a function of , $\log…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
