Preference Change in Persuasive Robotics
Matija Franklin, Hal Ashton

TL;DR
This paper examines how personalized robots can influence human preferences through social interactions, highlighting the potential for manipulation and the importance of understanding this influence in human-robot interaction.
Contribution
It expands on previous work by analyzing how adaptive, personalized robots can change user preferences and discusses the ethical implications of such influence.
Findings
Robots can significantly influence user preferences through social interaction.
Personalized robots have a high potential for manipulation.
The influence of robots raises ethical concerns about manipulation.
Abstract
Human-robot interaction exerts influence towards the human, which often changes behavior. This article explores an externality of this changed behavior - preference change. It expands on previous work on preference change in AI systems. Specifically, this article will explore how a robot's adaptive behavior, personalized to the user, can exert influence through social interactions, that in turn change a user's preference. It argues that the risk of this is high given a robot's unique ability to influence behavior compared to other pervasive technologies. Persuasive Robotics thus runs the risk of being manipulative.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEthics and Social Impacts of AI
