Investigating S-type asteroid surfaces through reflectance spectra of Ordinary Chondrites
J. Eschrig, L. Bonal, M. Mahlke, B. Carry, P. Beck, J. Gattacceca

TL;DR
This study analyzes the reflectance spectra of ordinary chondrites and S-type asteroids to understand surface compositions and classifications, revealing challenges in distinguishing equilibrated from unequilibrated types and correlations with asteroid size.
Contribution
The paper provides a comprehensive spectral comparison between chondrites and S-type asteroids, highlighting classification challenges and surface grain size correlations.
Findings
No clear spectral dichotomy between UOCs and EOCs.
Larger S-type asteroids tend to have finer-grained surfaces.
Misclassification rate of Antarctic UOCs is 74%.
Abstract
We present an in-depth study of the reflectance spectra of 39 equilibrated and 41 unequilibrated ordinary chondrites. We demonstrate that consistent measuring conditions are vital for the direct comparison of spectral features between chondrites, otherwise hampering any conclusions. We include a comparison with a total of 466 S-type asteroid reflectance spectra. We analyze (i) if a difference between EOCs and UOCs as well as between H, L and LL can be seen, (ii) if it is possible to identify unequilibrated and equilibrated S-type asteroid surfaces and (iii) if we can further constrain the match between OCs and S-type asteroids all based on reflectance spectra. We checked the classification of the 31 Antarctic UOCs analyzed in the present work, using petrography and magnetic measurements, and evidenced that 74% of them were misclassified. Reflectance spectra were compared between EOCs…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
