Why most molecular clouds are gravitationally dominated
Laura Ram\'irez-Galeano, Javier Ballesteros-Paredes, Rowan Smith,, Vianey Camacho, and Manuel Zamora-Aviles

TL;DR
This study compares traditional and comprehensive virial parameters for molecular clouds, revealing that many clouds are actually gravitationally bound or dominated when tidal effects are included, challenging previous unbound assumptions.
Contribution
It introduces a full virial parameter accounting for tidal forces, providing a more accurate assessment of molecular cloud gravitational states and their relation to turbulence.
Findings
50% of clouds are gravitationally bound when tides are considered
20% are dominated by gravity but disrupted by tides
Tidal forces originate from cloud complexes and stellar activity
Abstract
Observational and theoretical evidence suggests that a substantial population of molecular clouds (MCs) appear to be unbound, dominated by turbulent motions. However, these estimations are made typically via the so-called viral parameter , which is an observational proxy to the virial ratio between the kinetic and the gravitational energy. This parameter intrinsically assumes that MCs are isolated, spherical, and with constant density. However, MCs are embedded in their parent galaxy and thus are subject to compressive and disruptive tidal forces from their galaxy, exhibit irregular shapes, and show substantial substructure. We, therefore, compare the typical estimations of to a more precise definition of the virial parameter, , which accounts not only for the self-gravity (as $\alpha_{\rm…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
