Estimating the lifetime risk of a false positive screening test result
Tim White, Sara Algeri

TL;DR
This study estimates the high lifetime probability of false positive results in screening tests, highlighting the need for patient education about this common issue across various demographic groups.
Contribution
It provides the first comprehensive quantification of lifetime false positive risk across multiple diseases and demographic groups using a hierarchical statistical model.
Findings
85.5% lifetime false positive risk for women
38.9% lifetime false positive risk for men
Higher risk in vulnerable subpopulations
Abstract
False positive results in screening tests have potentially severe psychological, medical, and financial consequences for the recipient. However, there have been few efforts to quantify how the risk of a false positive accumulates over time. We seek to fill this gap by estimating the probability that an individual who adheres to the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) screening guidelines will receive at least one false positive in a lifetime. To do so, we assembled a data set of 116 studies cited by the USPSTF that report the number of true positives, false negatives, true negatives, and false positives for the primary screening procedure for one of five cancers or six sexually transmitted diseases. We use these data to estimate the probability that an individual in one of 14 demographic subpopulations will receive at least one false positive for one of these eleven diseases in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsColorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
