Process, Population, and Sample: the Researcher's Interest
Charles W. Champ, Andrew V. Sills

TL;DR
This paper discusses the distinction between process and population in research, emphasizing different statistical methods for inference about processes, populations, and individual collections, including estimation and prediction techniques.
Contribution
It clarifies the conceptual difference between estimation and prediction methods and discusses their application in statistical inference about processes and populations.
Findings
Methods for interval estimation of parameters
Techniques for prediction intervals
Analytical and enumerative approaches in inference
Abstract
A case is made that researchers are interested in studying processes. Often the inferences they are interested in making are about the process and its associated population. On other occasions, a researcher may be interested in making an inference about the collection of individuals the process has generated. We will call the statistical methods employed by the researcher to make such inferences about the process/population ``estimation methods.'' The statistical methods used in making an inference about the collection of individuals generated we call ``prediction methods.'' Methods for obtaining interval estimates of a parameter and prediction intervals for a statistic are given. The analytical and enumerative methods discussed in Deming (1953) are simply estimation and prediction methods, respectively.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComplex Systems and Decision Making · Forecasting Techniques and Applications · Statistics Education and Methodologies
