Stake-governed tug-of-war and the biased infinity Laplacian
Yujie Fu, Alan Hammond, G\'abor Pete

TL;DR
This paper analyzes a budgeted tug-of-war game on trees, deriving the game value as a biased infinity harmonic function and characterizing the Nash equilibrium with stakes related to the gradient of the value.
Contribution
It introduces a mathematical framework for a class of tug-of-war games with allocated budgets on trees, linking game value to the biased infinity Laplacian and characterizing equilibrium strategies.
Findings
Game value is a biased infinity harmonic function.
The ratio of remaining budgets remains constant during the game.
Stake proportions are determined by the gradient and λ-derivative of the game value.
Abstract
In tug-of-war, two players compete by moving a counter along edges of a graph, each winning the right to move at a given turn according to the flip of a possibly biased coin. The game ends when the counter reaches the boundary, a fixed subset of the vertices, at which point one player pays the other an amount determined by the boundary vertex. Economists and mathematicians have independently studied tug-of-war for many years, focussing respectively on resource-allocation forms of the game, in which players iteratively spend precious budgets in an effort to influence the bias of the coins that determine the turn victors; and on PDE arising in fine mesh limits of the constant-bias game in a Euclidean setting. In this article, we offer a mathematical treatment of a class of tug-of-war games with allocated budgets: each player is initially given a fixed budget which she draws on…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEconomic theories and models
