Optimality of Matched-Pair Designs in Randomized Controlled Trials
Yuehao Bai

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that a specific matched-pair design in stratified RCTs maximizes statistical precision for estimating the average treatment effect, outperforming other schemes in simulations.
Contribution
It identifies the optimal stratified randomization scheme, pairing units based on baseline outcomes to improve estimator precision in RCTs.
Findings
Matched-pair design maximizes statistical precision.
Simulation shows 10% average reduction in standard error.
Up to 34% reduction in standard error in some cases.
Abstract
In randomized controlled trials (RCTs), treatment is often assigned by stratified randomization. I show that among all stratified randomization schemes which treat all units with probability one half, a certain matched-pair design achieves the maximum statistical precision for estimating the average treatment effect (ATE). In an important special case, the optimal design pairs units according to the baseline outcome. In a simulation study based on datasets from 10 RCTs, this design lowers the standard error for the estimator of the ATE by 10% on average, and by up to 34%, relative to the original designs.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Causal Inference Techniques · Statistical Methods and Inference · Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
