Polaris: The Mathematics of Navigation and the Shape of the Earth

TL;DR

This paper rigorously analyzes ancient navigation laws using elementary trigonometry, confirming the Earth's spherical shape and challenging Flat Earth models through mathematical proofs and measurements.

Contribution

It converts empirical navigation laws into rigorous theorems and extends the analysis to Flat Earth models, providing mathematical validation of Earth's sphericity.

Findings

Empirical Law 1 is a theorem based on elementary trigonometry.

The Earth's circumference is approximately 40,000 km.

Mathematical models disprove Flat Earth hypotheses without satellite images.

Abstract

For millenia, sailors have used the empirical rule that the elevation angle of Polaris, the North Star, as measured by sextant, quadrant or astrolabe, is approximately equal to latitude. Here, we show using elementary trigonometry that Empirical Law 1 can be converted from a heuristic to a theorem. A second ancient empirical law is that the distance in kilometers from the observer to the North Pole, the geodesic distance measured along the spherical surface of the planet, is the number of degrees of colatitude multiplied by 111.1 kilometers. Can Empirical Law 2 be similarly rendered rigorous? No; whereas as the shape of the planet is controlled by trigonometry, the size of our world is an accident of cosmological history. However, Empirical Law 2, can be rigorously verified by measurements. The association of 111 km of north-south distance to one degree of latitude trivially yields the circumference of the globe as 40,000 km. We also extend these ideas and the parallel ray approximation to three different ways of modeling a Flat Earth. We show that photographs from orbit, taken by a very expensive satellite, are unnecessary to render the Flat Earth untenable; simple mathematics proves Earth a sphere just as well.