How are policy gradient methods affected by the limits of control?
Ingvar Ziemann, Anastasios Tsiamis, Henrik Sandberg, Nikolai Matni

TL;DR
This paper examines how control-theoretic limitations impact stochastic policy gradient methods, revealing issues like noisy estimates and the curse of dimensionality in certain system classes.
Contribution
It provides a control-theoretic analysis of policy gradient methods, highlighting conditions causing noise and complexity issues not previously well-understood.
Findings
Ill-conditioned systems lead to noisy gradient estimates.
Stable systems can still suffer from the curse of dimensionality.
Results apply to both fully observed and partially observed systems.
Abstract
We study stochastic policy gradient methods from the perspective of control-theoretic limitations. Our main result is that ill-conditioned linear systems in the sense of Doyle inevitably lead to noisy gradient estimates. We also give an example of a class of stable systems in which policy gradient methods suffer from the curse of dimensionality. Our results apply to both state feedback and partially observed systems.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMarkov Chains and Monte Carlo Methods
